SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 840

A.H.JOSHI
ZAFAR ALI S/o LATE AKBAR ALI – Appellant
Versus
SHAMIM AKHATAR W/o AKBAR SAHEB – Respondent


Advocates:
A.M.Ansari, H.D.DANGRE

( 1 ) THIS is an application for condonation of delay of 304 days in filing Second Appeal.

( 2 ) IN the application for condonation of delay, notice thereof is issued at first hearing routinely. This is not done unmindfully, but is done mostly due to a feeling of compassion towards the litigant. Compassion is inevitably an essential ingredient of process of Administration of Justice.

( 3 ) IT, however, lateron reveals in many cases that appeal itself is found to have no merit, and the respondent is vexed, though it was avoidable.

( 4 ) IN order to avoid such a situation, it is felt that whenever, prima facie, merits of the appeal are not very strong, the respondent should not be unnecessarily vexed by issuing a notice in the application for condonation, filed in such appeal, i. e. , appeal of doubtful merit. It would rather be preferable to hear the appeal to ascertain its merits.

( 5 ) THEREFORE, the learned Adv. , for the appellants was called to argue and demonstrate the merit of appeal.

( 6 ) LEARNED Advocates for appellants urged that : -

(a) It is a practice in vogue that ordinarily whenever the application for condonation of delay is listed for first hearing, notices or Rule a
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top