SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 814

ANOOP V.MOHTA
ADITYA BIRLA RETAIL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ASHAPURA DEVELOPERS – Respondent


Advocates:
ANIRUDHA JOSHI, DURGESH KHANAPURKAR, Jagdish G.Ara

V. MOHTA ANOOP, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has invoked section 9 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, "the Act") for securing the amount of Rs. 4,34,59,200/- (Four crores thirty four lacs fifty nine thousand two hundred only) with interest @ 18% p. a. from 27th October, 2008 with a liberty to withdraw the same; also prayed that in the event the respondent failed to deposit the amount, to issue a Warrant of Attachment before judgment under the Provisions of order XXXVIII of the Code of Civil procedure (for short, "c. P. C. ") and attach the premises described in the plaint; also prayed for an injunction against them from selling, transferring, alienating, encumbering, disposing off or creating any third party right, title or interest of the premises described in Exhibit "a".

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, there is an arbitration clause in the agreement, executed between the parties called "the leave and license agreement" dated 5/7/2008. On the same day, three other agreements being (i) Facilities agreement, (ii) Parking and Amenities Agreement and (iii) Option Agreement were also executed between them.

( 3 ) THE petitioner duly deposited with the respondent a refundable securit






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top