SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 309

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
K. U. Chandiwal, J.
SANDIP GOPINATH BHALKE
Versus
ARUNA SANDIP BHALKE
S. A. No. 361 of 2005
Decided On : MARCH 5, 2009

Advocates:
D.R.Markad, S.D.KULKARNI

Assessment of conduct and sanctity of marriage in determining cruelty and desertion.

Headnote:

Divorce - Desertion and Cruelty - Indian Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code - [Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 498-A of Indian Penal Code] - The court discussed the allegations of desertion and mental cruelty, considering the evidence and legal precedents. The court emphasized the importance of assessing the conduct of the parties and the sanctity of marriage in determining cruelty and desertion. The court also highlighted the impact of cultural heritage and the need for reconciliation in matrimonial disputes.

Fact of the Case:

The husband sought divorce on grounds of desertion and mental cruelty, alleging that the wife left the matrimonial home and caused mental trouble. The wife denied the allegations and urged for dismissal of the divorce petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the husband failed to prove that he was subjected to cruelty or deserted by the wife. The court emphasized the importance of assessing the conduct of the parties and the sanctity of marriage in determining cruelty and desertion.

Issues: The issues included whether the petitioner was subjected to cruelty, whether the respondent deserted the petitioner, and whether the petitioner was entitled to divorce.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to assess the conduct of the parties and the sanctity of marriage in determining cruelty and desertion. The court also highlighted the impact of cultural heritage and the need for reconciliation in matrimonial disputes.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the substantial questions of law were answered in the negative.

( 1 ) THE judgment and order dated 17-9-2003 passed by additional District Judge, Shrirampur in R. C. A. No. 32/2001, rejecting Divorce by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division, shrirampur in Hindu Marriage Petition No. 75/1999, is under challenge by husband.

( 2 ) THE parties are referred for convenience as husband and wife and at places with their first names Sandeep and Aruna. The marriage dated 10-2-1996 is in existence. According to husband, the petitioner barely resided for initial eight days, then she left with her brother Somnath and thereafter she was in his company for 6-7 months. Even, during this short span, the wife caused mental trouble to the husband and his mother.

( 3 ) ON 26-1-1997. the wife-Aruna went to her parents house with her brother Vijay and in March, 1997, she delivered a child. The petitioner/husband made all efforts for cohabitation,, but he was abused and driven away by the wife. Consequently, a notice was issued, asking the wife to join him. The wife did not comply. There was desertion and decree for divorce was sought. The proceedings under section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code and also 498-A of indian Penal Code by wife has caused mental torture to the husband, providing additional avenue to seek divorce.

( 4 ) THE wife Aruna denied the allegations of desertion or causing any mental cruelty to the husband. After birth of the child - Onkar, husband did not make any visit, all attempts from the wife to join the husband are curtailed and inhibited systematically supported by his mother. She reiterated that she was facing ill-treatment from the husband and his mother. She went in February 1998 for cohabitation with her brother Sanjay, but there was no response. It was the husband, who gave cruel treatment and deserted her and she consequently urged for dismissal of the divorce petition.

( 5 ) LEARNED Civil Judge, Senior Division, formulated issues, at Exhibit-20 and recorded that there was mental cruelty to the husband, the wife left the house forever without intention to come back and that the husband is entitled for divorce.

( 6 ) THE first Appellate Court did not agree with the findings. He formulated following points, viz.-

(i) Is it proved that petitioner was subjected to cruelty at the hands of respondent ? (ii) Is it proved that the respondent has deserted the petitioner without just cause ? (iii) Whether the petitioner is entitled for divorce ? (iv) What order ?

( 7 ) THE learned Judge by recording negative findings allowed the appeal of the wife. The petition for divorce came to be dismissed.

( 8 ) THE substantial questions of law are formulated by brother Judge, while admitting the appeal on 15th of December, 2008, which are as under :

(i) Whether subsequent events and conduct during the pendency of the petition and appeal can be taken into account for the purpose of granting relief to the appellant and reckless and wild allegations made by the wife in the proceedings by going beyond the purview of what was necessary for denying the allegations made against her will amount to cruelty and is sufficient to dissolve the marriage by decree of divorce ? (ii) Whether in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2002 AIR SCW 162, an act committed with an intention to cause suffering to other party and even filing false proceeding will amount to cruelty ? (iii) Whether in view of law laid down by this Court in 2002 (3) Mh. L. J. 872 the impact of cumulative events and circumstances in the mind of the husband can be considered as cruelty and decree for divorce can be granted on that ground ?

( 9 ) IN order to prove the case, the husband has examined himself and his witnesses-Sushila Gopinath; Suman Dagdu, a social worker; Nanasaheb Shankar and Rukhminibai Vitthal, while the wife has examined herself.

( 10 ) THE term 'desertion' is practically separation of one spouse from the other with intention on the part of deserting spouse of bringing c














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top