C.L.PANGARKAR
CHANDRAKANT HARIBHAU ADMANE – Appellant
Versus
PRASHANT MANOHAR ADMANE – Respondent
( 2 ) FACTS giving rise to this appeal are as follows : plaintiff is the daughter of one Marotrao Rahate. She was married to one i laribhau Admane. Marotrao had only one son who predeceased him. Marotrao died in the year 1955 leaving behind him the suit property. Defendants 6, 7, 8 and 9 are the daughters of said Marotrao. Plaintiff is also one of the daughters. The suit property was the self acquired property of said Marotrao. Plaintiff submits that she is in possession of one block while defendant No. 7 Tulsabai is also in possession of the suit house. Defendants 1 and 9 are also living in some portion of the suit house. Defendant No. 1 is the mother of the plaintiff. Plaintiff submits that Tulsabai, one of her sisters was living with defendant No. 1 Parvatabai who is also in occupation of the part of the suit property. It is her case that it was agreed that in lieu of their share each of the sisters will occupy part of the suit house. Plaintiff contends that she has learnt that Gift Deed has been executed by defendant No. 1 in favour of defendant No. 10 Manohar. It is her contentio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.