SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 1068

C.L.PANGARKAR
CHANDRAKANT HARIBHAU ADMANE – Appellant
Versus
PRASHANT MANOHAR ADMANE – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.Maldhure, S.V.PUROHIT

( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal is preferred by the original plaintiff who lost in both the Courts below.

( 2 ) FACTS giving rise to this appeal are as follows : plaintiff is the daughter of one Marotrao Rahate. She was married to one i laribhau Admane. Marotrao had only one son who predeceased him. Marotrao died in the year 1955 leaving behind him the suit property. Defendants 6, 7, 8 and 9 are the daughters of said Marotrao. Plaintiff is also one of the daughters. The suit property was the self acquired property of said Marotrao. Plaintiff submits that she is in possession of one block while defendant No. 7 Tulsabai is also in possession of the suit house. Defendants 1 and 9 are also living in some portion of the suit house. Defendant No. 1 is the mother of the plaintiff. Plaintiff submits that Tulsabai, one of her sisters was living with defendant No. 1 Parvatabai who is also in occupation of the part of the suit property. It is her case that it was agreed that in lieu of their share each of the sisters will occupy part of the suit house. Plaintiff contends that she has learnt that Gift Deed has been executed by defendant No. 1 in favour of defendant No. 10 Manohar. It is her contentio


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top