2010 Supreme(Bom) 599
High Court of Judicature at Bombay
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ROSHAN DALVI
Harsha Nitin Kokate
Versus
The Saraswat Co-op. Bank Ltd. & Others
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2351 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 1972 OF 2008
Decided on : 20-04-2010
For the Plaintiff:A.K. Maheshwari, Advocate.
For the Defendants:D1, Ms. Shyama Parkar i/b. M.P .Rege & Co., D3, H.S. Shreepad Murthy, Advocates.
Headnote:(A) Companies Act (1956), S.109-A:- Nomination of Shares – Procedure and effect explained – Procedure is the registration of the form of nomination constituting the nomination of the nominee with his photograph signed by the holder as well as the nominee and witnessed by at least 2 persons and registered with the Bank –Purpose of the provision is simplification of nomination as the shares are Dmat form and no physical certificate will be issued by the company and ensure that a single nomination and registration of the shares is made only with the Depository Participant who records all the share transactions of the holder of the shares
(B) Companies Act (1956), S.109-A Depositories Act (1996), S.9.11 Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act (1960), S.30:- Once the nomination of the shares is recorded with the Depository Participant as prescribed, the nominee will have all the rights of the shares as tangible property - Non-obstante Clause in Section 9.11.7 of Depositories Act gives the nomination the effect of the Testamentary Disposition itself and makes all other provisions regarding testamentary disposition subject to this provision.
1. The Plaintiff married one Nitin Kokate on 3rd December 2004. Her husband expired on 5th July 2007. Nitin Kokate held certain shares in Dmat Account with the Depository Participant Cell of Defendant No.1. Her husband executed a nomination in the prescribed form following the prescribed procedure set out by the Depository Participant, Defendant No.1 Bank in favour of the Defendant No.3, his nephew on 11th July 2006. The Plaintiff claims an interest in the said shares as his heir and legal representative. She claims to have them sold.
2. This Suit is not concerned with the reason why she claims the sale of the shares. The Plaintiff must show her legal right, title and interest in those shares. If that is shown, the Plaintiff would be entitled to sell or transfer those shares or to hold them as her own.
3. The Defendant No.3 claims right, title and interest in the shares pursuant to the nomination executed in his favour. The nomination has been executed well prior to the death of the deceased and well after his marriage with the Plaintiff. The Defendant No.1 Bank has stated that the nomination is executed as required and has been so registered with the Depository Participant. The effect of the nomination is, therefore, to be seen. The nomination form itself shows that the rights of transfer and/or the amount payable in respect of the securities held by Nitin Kokate, Defendant No.3 vests in him as the said nominee.
4. The law relating to nomination is set out in 109A of the Companies Act pursuant to the amendment which came into effect on 31st October 1998. It is common knowledge that prior to 1996 shares were not held in dematerialized form. Consequent upon the Dematting of the shares the Share Certificates in physical form are not mandatorily required to be issued by the Limited Companies listed on the Stock Exchanges. Shares can be transferred by word of mouth or on the Internet from person to person. Upon such transfer the membership rights of the holder of the shares changes. Since the share is an intangible movable property it is bequeathable estate The nomination in respect of the shares is, therefore, important. Section 109A sets out the rights of the holder of shares to nominate as well as the rights of the nominees thus:-
S. 109A. Nomination of shares – (1) Every holder of shares in, or holder of debentures of a company may, at any time, nominate, in the prescribed manner, a person to whom his shares in or debentures of, the company shall vest in the event of his death.
(2) ...........
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any disposition, whether testamentary or otherwise, in respect of such shares in, or debentures of, the company, where a nomination made in the prescribed manner purports to confer on any person the right to vest the shares in, or debentures of, the company, the nominee shall, on the death of the shareholder or holder of debentures of the company or, as the case may be, on the death of the joint holders become entitled to all the rights in the shares or debentures of the company or, as the case may be, all the joint holders, in relation to such shares in, or debentures of the company to the exclusion of all other persons, unless the nomination is varied or cancelled in the prescribed manner.
(4).........
It can be seen from the aforesaid provision that nomination is required to be made in the prescribed manner. Upon such nomination the shares would vest in the nominee in the event of the death of the holder. Further upon it being made in the prescribed manner the nominee would become entitled to all the rights in the shares of the Company to the exclusion of all other persons. That is the effect of vesting the shares in the nominee.
5. Mr. Maheshwari drew my attention to the Depositories Act 1996. Section 9.11 thereof relates to transmission of securities in the case of nomination. Section 9.11 runs thus:-
9.11. TRANSMISSION OF SECURITIES