D.D.SINHA, MRIDULA BHATKAR
Jadhav Shankar Dyandeo – Appellant
Versus
Collector at Satara – Respondent
D.D. Sinha, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government for the respondent no.1 and the learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.
2. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are project affected persons, who became landless and were rehabilitated in Village Revadi by allotting an area admeasuring about 4000 sq. ft. each. The petitioners made representation for formation of separate village of all the rehabilitated villagers as they have separate problems than the other villagers. On 6th August 1995 notification was issued by the Additional Collector by exercising power under section 4(1) of The Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (for the sake of brevity and convenience referred to as “MLR Code”) and new village by name Tambi Punarvasit came to be established. On 4th December 1999 notification in official gazette by exercising power under section 4(2) of The Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 (for the sake of brevity and convenience referred to as “the BVP Act”) and Article 243 (g) of the Constitution of India, 1950 (for the sake of brevity and convenience referred to as “the Constitution”) was published.
3. It i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.