A. H. JOSHI, J.:- This Court had issued notice official disposal returnable on 9th April, 2010.

2. This application for review is opposed by respondent No.2 as well by respondent No.3 by filing their respective affidavits.

3. Heard learned Adv. Mr. S. R. Narnaware for the petitioner, learned AGP Mr. S. S. Doifode for respondent No.1. learned Adv. Mr. S. M. Puranik for respondent No.3 and learned Adv. Mr. Abhay Sambre for respondent No.3.

4. The grounds, which are put forth on which review is sought, are narrated in paras 1 to 9 of the Review Application, which are summarized as follows :-

[a] Summary of point raised in Paras 1, 3 & 9 :-

The Appointment Order did not indicate that the applicant-petitioner was appointed on a post reserved for a tribal candidate. Though applicant's tri be claim was invalidated, her employment was liable to be protected in view of judgment in case of Milind Katware and many similar cases decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court.

[b] Summary of point raised in Paras 4 & .8.:-

Shri. K. M. Pathak. Member of Scrutiny Committee, holds qualification of B.Com., and Master of Social Work. He does not hold Master's degree in Sociology or Anthropology which are the qua