SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 1639

A.P.BHANGALE
YESHW ANT BHADUJI GHUSE – Appellant
Versus
VITHOBAJI LAXMAN LADEKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For appellant: R. S. Parsodkar
For respondent: Ms. Mugdha Atre

JUDGMENT :- This second appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 30th January, 1998 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 124 of 1992 passed by 2nd Additional District Judge, Wardha whereby appeal was dismissed which was preferred against the judgment and decree passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Wardha in Regular Civil Suit No. 138 of 1987 on 17-9-1992.

2. A layout of plots was carved out in Land Survey Nos. 141/1 and 141/3 at Seloo by vendor of appellant/plaintiff Yeshwant. Vendor Ashok Deshpande had retained one plot admeasuring 24 x 30 square feet, shown by letters A E F C in the plaint map. Plaintiff purchased suit plot by a registered sale deed dated 1310-1986 from Ashok Deshpande, which is shown by letters ABCD in the plaint map. Defendant purchased a plot from the same layout, shown by letters O P Q R in the plaint map whereon he constructed a residential house. In absence of plaintiff, defendant made encroachment beyond the line shown by letters O P by constructing temporary latrine (shown by letters C D). Plot purchased by plaintiff in the name of his was is bearing plot No. 23. Out of Plot No. 15 located just opposite Plot No. 23 beyond road, plaintiff
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top