SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Bom) 342

F.M.REIS
HARISH KASHINATH MANE – Appellant
Versus
HARIBHAU ADKOJI SAPATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For appellant:Nitin Vyawahare For respondent: A. S. Bhandarkar

ORDER :- Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and the respondent.

2. This appeal challenges the judgment and decree dated 11-11-2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Gadchiroli in regular Civil Appeal No. 25 of 2009 thereby rejecting the appeal filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 27-2-2009 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Armori in regular Civil Suit No. 9 of 2002. The respondent was the owner of the land bearing gat No. 1217 admeasuring 0.78 H.R. at Armori, district Gadchiroli, which was purchased by him from one Smt. Barubai Adkuji Satpute on 12-9-1989. It is the contention of the respondent that an agreement for sale was entered into between the respondent and the appellant along with one Narayan and Ranjana, whereby the entire property was agreed to be purchase, admeasuring 0.78 H. R. on 16-9-1989 for a total consideration of Rs. 2,00,000/- of which Rs. 55,000/- were paid as an earnest money. The said transaction coula not be completed as the parties refused to perform their respective parts of their contract. It is further the case of the respondent that the appellant is an adjacent owner and occupier of certain area























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top