SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 1592

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
B.R. GAVAI, J.
Bhatu s/o. Devidas Patil,… .. Petitioners
versus
The State of Maharashtra… .. Respondents.
WRIT PETITION NO. 7974 OF 2009
Decided on : 26TH NOVEMBER 2009.

Advocates appeared:
Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2.

The eligibility to vote in the election from a constituency is based on being a member of the Grampanchayat, and the authority has the power to make corrections in the voters' list even after its final publication.

Headnote:

Voters' List - Challenge to Deletion of Names - Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, Section 13 - Rule 36(9) to (16)

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the deletion of their names from the voters' list for the elections of Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Amalner, based on the eligibility date for enrollment in the electoral roll.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the action taken by the respondent in deleting the names of the petitioners and including the names of the newly elected members of the Grampanchayat was in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Rule 36(10) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1967.

Issues: The main issue was the deletion of names from the voters' list based on the change in the constitution of the Grampanchayat due to elections held on 26th March 2009.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the basic qualification to vote in the election from the constituency concerned is to be a member of the Grampanchayat, and the respondent's approach in passing the impugned order was in line with the provisions of Rule 36(9) to (16) of the said Rules.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed as it was devoid of any merit.

JUDGMENT :

1. By way of present petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 16th November 2009, passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Jalgaon, vide which the names of the petitioners have been deleted from the voters' list of the Gram Panchayat constituency finalized for the elections of Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Amalner.

2. Mr. V.D. Hon, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that the programme for holding general elections to the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Amalner, was declared on 19th January 2009. He submits that vide the said programme, the eligibility date for enrollment in the electoral roll, in so far as members of the Grampanchayat is concerned, was notified as 12th November 2008. He submits that though the election was scheduled in the month of March, the same came to be postponed on account of elections to the Legislative Assembly. He submits that subsequently, vide order dated 26th October 2009, another communication was issued by the District Deputy Registrar, respondent no.2 herein, regarding finalization of the voters' list. According to the said programme, the date which was fixed for taking objections was 5th November 2009. The date for deciding objections under Rule 36(10) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Rules") was fixed on 16th November 2009 and the date for publication of final voters' list was fixed on 19th November 2009. It is submitted that though the names of the petitioners were included in the provisional voters' list vide order dated 16th November 2009, their names have been excluded and some other names have been included vide the impugned order. Mr. Hon, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that since the cut off date, in so far as the Grampanchayat constituency is concerned, was 12th November 2008, the respondent no.2 has erred in deleting the names of the petitioners and including the new names.

3. Section 13 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 (For short, hereinafter referred to as "the said Act") deals with "Constitution of Market Committees". The relevant portion of Section 13 of the Act is reproduced as under :

" Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), every Market Committee shall consist of the following members, namely :

(a) thirteen agriculturists residing in the market area (not being less than twenty-one years of age on the date specified from time to time by the Collector in this behalf), as specified below -

(i) .................................................................

(ii) four (of which one shall be a person belonging to the Scheduled Castes or

Scheduled Tribes and one shall be a person belonging to economically weaker section), shall be elected by members of the village panchayats functioning therein. "

(Emphasis supplied)

Perusal of Section 13(1)(a)(ii) would, therefore, reveal that four persons, one of which shall be a person belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes and one of whom shall be belonging to economically weaker section, are to be elected to the Market Committee by the members of village panchayats. It can thus be clearly seen that the electoral college for electing a person from the said constituency, consists of members of the Village Panchayat functioning in the area of Agricultural Produce Market Committee.

4. Rule 36 of the said Rules deals with "Voters' list". The relevant Sub-Rules, for the purpose of the present petition, would be Sub- Rules 9 to 16, which read thus :

"36. Voters' list -

(1) to (8) .......................................................................

(9) Every claim or objection shall be delivered or sent by post so as to reach the office of the Collector before the date fixed by the Collector in that behalf being a date not later than one month from the date of publication of the list.

(10) The Collector, after hearing t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top