A.M.KHANWILKAR, A.P.BHANGALE
Charu Kishor Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
A.P. Bhangale, J.
1. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of learned Counsel representing the parties. Heard submissions.
2. The Petitioner prayed for issuance of the writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding Respondent no. 2 to forthwith file a FIR and carry out a thorough investigation in to the offences set out in the complaint of in the said complaint for punishment of the Accused therein and all persons connected with the said offence in accordance with law.
3. Facts briefly stated are-The Petitioner-Complainant had by an communication dated 25th April 2008 addressed to the Additional Commissioner of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Crime branch C.I.D., Mumbai, made accusations that Shri Vijay Kirtilal Mehta, in pursuance of Criminal Conspiracy alongwith Dr. Narendra Trivedi, Dr Sanjay Prabhat Kapadia, Shri Rozario F. Paacheco, Shri Anant Kamath, Shri Lawrence Pareira, Shri Rajendra Kairnar, Shri Charanjit Singh Rekhi, Shri Dushyant Madhukant Mehata, Smt Jasmin Dushyanta Mehata, Shri Ganpat Balu Malap, Shri Sharan P. Khanna, Shri Jagdish B. Ahuja and 28 others forged or caused to be forged various documents including alleged
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.