SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 447

ANOOP V.MOHTA
Ashok Saha – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:K.M. John, Advocate. For the Respondents:Ms. Smita Gaidhani, A.G.P., R4, Lawrence D’Costa, present in person, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :-

P.C.:

1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order as the same was passed without considering the provisions of Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (in short, the M.C.S. Act). The relevant portion of Section 83 Clause (1) reads as under:-

“Sec.83(1): The Registrar may of his own motion, and shall on the application of one-third of the members of a society, himself or by a person duly authorized by him in writing in this behalf, hold an inquiry into the constitution, working and financial conditions of a society.”

2. The point so, as raised is restricted to the initiation of the proceeding/enquiry by the Registrar as contemplated under Section 83 of the M.C.S. Act.

3. The Registrar of his own motion, himself or by any person authorized by him, can hold an enquiry into the constitution, working and financial condition of a society. But, in the present case, admittedly, a complaint dated 13.6.2009 was filed by respondent No.4 and based upon this, on 27.7.2009, by exercising powers under Section 83 of the M.C.S. Act, he appointed an enquiry officer and directed to conduct an enquiry against the society.

4. The order so passed itself provides







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top