Key Points: - State appealed acquittal under Sections 452, 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC by trial court in RCC No. 47/1996 (!) (!) - Accused entered complainant's house with sticks over society loan dispute, assaulted complainant and witness Suryabhan Randhe (!) (!) (!) - Trial court acquitted accused due to discrepancies in witness statements, medical evidence inconsistencies, and investigation lapses (!) [4000354130007][4000354130009] - High Court relied on consistent evidence of PW2 (complainant), PW5 (injured witness), PW7 (eyewitness), and medical evidence confirming 10 injuries on complainant and injury on PW5 (!) (!) (!) [4000354130021] - High Court convicted all four accused under Section 451 (house-trespass to commit offence punishable with imprisonment) and Section 506 (criminal intimidation) IPC [4000354130022] (!) - Accused No.2 Bhausaheb and No.3 Sominath additionally convicted under Section 323 IPC for voluntarily causing hurt [4000354130024] (!) - Acquittal maintained for Sections 326, 324 r/w 34 due to insufficient evidence of specific overt acts by accused No.1 and No.4 [4000354130023] - Sentences: Till rising of court; fines Rs.2000 each for A1 & A4, Rs.5000 each for A2 & A3 (!) (!) - Parties settled via compromise petition, but court imposed convictions with lenient sentence considering time elapsed since 1996 [4000354130025] (!) - Appeal partly allowed, revision disposed of; compliance listed on 10.03.2011 (!) (!) (!)