SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 443

A.P.BHANGALE
Ganeshsing Bisansing Bawari – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant: R.M. Daga, Counsel.
For the Respondent: S.R. Deshpande, Special Public Prosecutor.

Judgment :-

By this application applicant prays to quash and set aside the order dated 09.10.2007 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Wardha in Criminal Revision Application No. 66 of 2002 with further prayer to restore the order dated 24.09.2002 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ashti below application Ex. 19 in Criminal Proceeding arising from Crime No. 193 of 2002 registered by Forest Officer under Sections 9 and 39 of The Indian Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

2] It is the case of the applicant that vehicle belonging to him being a tractor with registration no. MH-31/Z-8363 and trolly with registration no. MH-31/Z-8397 were seized by Forest Officials on the allegations that the said tractor and trolly were used for carrying flesh of wild pigs and that offence under Sections 9 and 39 of the Indian Wild Life (Protection) Act 1972 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code was committed.

3] It appears that the applicant had moved before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Ashti an application for grant of interim custody of tractor as well as trolly referred above. It appears that after hearing the said application (Ex. 19) learned Judicial Magistrate First Class






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top