SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 703

2011 ALL MR (Cri) 2642
In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
A.P. BHANGALE
Deepak Prabhakarrao Chondekar & Others
Versus
State of Maharashtra, Through the Police Station Officer
Criminal Writ Petition Nos. 107 of 2011 , 108 of 2011 & 109 of 2011
Decided on: 27-06-2011

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants:K.H. Deshpande, Sr. Adv, with A.M. Sudame, Advocate.
For the Respondent: M.K. Pathan, A.S. Parihar, D.B. Yengal, APP.

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482-Quashing of proceedings-No sufficient and reasonable ground to proceed further against accused-Continuation of proceedings still further-Results in sheer harassment to accused to undergo rigors of trial in absence of any chance of conviction-Such criminal proceedings deserves to be quashed under Section 482 of Code.-When there is no sufficient and reasonable ground to proceed further against the accused and if the proceedings still continue further, it would be sheer harassment to the accused to undergo rigors of trial in the absence of any chance of conviction. Such case is fit case to use the powers of the Court available under Section 482 of the Code for to quash the criminal proceedings.

       Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 107-Abetment-Meaning of-Term "abetment" means to instigate, urge forward, to provoke, to incite or to encourage to do or to goad doing of an act.-The term ’abetment’ means to instigate, urge forward, to provoke, to incite, or to encourage to do or to goad doing of an act.

       Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 306-Abetment of suicide-A clear mens rea must be to commit offence under Section 306 of Code-Intention of accused to aid or to instigate or to abet deceased to commit suicide, a must for specific offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC.

       Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Scope of. When a prosecution at initial stage is asked to be quashed, test to be applied by Court is as to whether uncontroverted allegations prima facie establish offence.

       Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - IPC, Sections 306 and 384 - Quashing of charge-sheet. Where there was nothing on record to show that petitioners intended to abet or instigate suicide by deceased therefore proceedings against petitioner initiated under Sections 306 and 384 of IPC quashed and set aside.

JUDGMENT

1. Rule. Taken up for final hearing by consent at the stage of admission. Heard submissions at the Bar. The Petitioners have prayed for to quash and set aside the charge-sheet dated 30/12/2010, in Criminal Case No.114 of 2010, filed before the Judicial Magistrate, Kelapur, Taluka Kelapur, District Yavatmal (copy annexed with the petitions). The Petitioners were charge-sheeted for alleged offences punishable under Section 306 and 284 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Pandharkawada Police Station in District Yavatmal reported that on 22/02/2010, Deputy Conservator of Forest Shri. Gopalrao Kisanrao Kale at about 7.00 to 9.30 a.m., at his official residence had consumed poison and committed suicide. The oral report was lodged by one Shri. Shamu Bhadu Rathod and accidental death case was registered as A D Case No. 16 of 2010 under Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code. An alleged suicide note was seized mentioning thus:-

The suicide note dated 22/02/2010 attributed that with a view to cause mental harassment to the writer, Shri. Tongo, Shri Potulwar and Shri Chondhikar took assistance of Clerks Shaikh and Mr. D. V Shukla and published false information against him in Daily “Sahasik” therefore he is defamed in the society. One Farukh Khan Pathan of “Aaj tak Channel” and a Senior journalist are blackmailing. They are causing hurdle in the official work and are not helping. They are instigating employees in the office to leave office during the working hours. Apart from this, incompetent employees like Shri. Bhise, Shri. Pattiwar are provided to Divisional Office due to which no work can be taken from them. With this reference correspondence is made to Higher authorities but no action has been taken in that regard. Hence I am committing suicide being tired of harassment by Tongo, Chondhikar, Clerk Shaikh and D.V. Shukla. They are wholly responsible for this.

Police Inspector Shri C. B. Bais of the Pandharkawada recorded the complaint lodged by Sau. Prabha Gopal Kale, widow of the deceased. The statement of Prabha stated that she had occasion to talk with her Husband on Phone at the evening of 21/02/2010 from Nanded where she had gone to see her sick Mother. At that time her Husband had informed her that he is not feeling to take food when advised by her to take medicines and have dinner, he replied that nobody is cooperating in the office and work could not be done. He has severe tension of office. The investigation revealed that the deceased had consumed insecticide “Nuon”. Series of newspaper reports had appeared against the deceased illegal felling of trees and selling them to contractor of their choice alleging the corruption against the forest officials Gopal Kale (deceased as also Rajan Tongo (one of the accused)). The news paper reports requested the Government to take action in to alleged wrongdoings and corrupt practices by the forest officials, mainly the deceased Gopal Kale in Pandharkawada Forest Division.

3. On behalf of the Petitioners it is submitted that the alleged suicide note is vague as it accuses the petitioners that they revealed the information to journalists who published the News reports. It is contended that when an hypersensitive, depressed or mentally quite infirm person take a drastic step to end his life or a person commit suicide in utter fit of anger and emotion it can not be said that the suicide was abetted. Forest Officials in Pandharkawada were required to look after the Forest administration, perform duties to explore, regenerate and protect the forest in accordance with the sanctioned working plan. The Divisional Forest Officials are required to conduct Sale, Contract, supply material to department and the Public and to raise revenue and control the expenditure and to deal with the forest cases with requisite transparency. The accusations in the Chargesheet were not at all made out as there was no prima facie ground whatsoever to believe and proceed ahead with accusat





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top