SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 63

R.M.SAVANT
Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Ajabrao Gulabrao Deshmukh – Respondent


JUDGMENT;-

The above applications and the Appeals were on board on 13.01.20 II when none had appeared on behalf of the respondent! Respondents / claimants, and hence the matters were adjourned for today. When the matters are called out today, the same position continues and none appears for the contesting respondent/ respondents/ claimants, hence this Court is constrained to proceed with the matters in their absence. By order dated 29.10.20I0 the respondents in the above matters were put to notice that the appeals may be heard and decided finally at the stage of admission, in view of the connected issues that arises in all the above Appeals.

2. By the above Civil Applications, the applicants i.e. the acquiring body seeks condonation of delay caused in filing the First Appeals. The lands in question have been acquired for 'Pentakli Minor Irrigation Project'. No affidavit in reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents/claimants, hence the case put up by the applicants for condonation of delay, has gone uncontroverted and would therefore, have to be accepted, resultantly, the delay in filing the above appeals would therefore, have to be condoned. Civil Applications are accordingly




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top