1. Respondent no.1-Shivkripa Builders & Developers, a partnership firm in both the above appeals is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 2371 of 2009. The appellants in Appeal Nos. 286 of 2011 and 300 of 2011 are respondent no.4 and respondent no.8 respectively in the aforesaid writ petition. The appellants in the both the appeals are challenging a common order dated 15th April, 2011 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2371 of 2009 whereby the writ petition was allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), thereby setting aside the order impugned in the writ petition. For the sake of brevity and convenience hereinafter the parties are referred to by their respective nomenclature in Writ Petition No.2371 of 2009.

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeals are as follows:

Plot nos. 88 to 104 at Worli Scheme 58, admeasuring approximately about 42,955.22 sq. mtrs. is owned by MCGM and is occupied by slum dwellers. The slum dwellers since they had no basic amenities, formed a Co-operative Housing Society i.e. respondent no.4 and decided to redevelop the slum under DCR No. 33(10). Respondent No.4-Society had agreed to appoint petitioner as