SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 849

ANOOP V.MOHTA
Sai Om Petro Specialities Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M. Industries – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. SUNITA SONAWANE for the Plaintiff.
None for the Defendant.

JUDGMENT

The Plaintiff is a builder/promoter, has filed this Suit for recovery of alleged maintenance charges based upon the bills raised from time to time on the foundation of agreement for sale dated 31 August 2004 (the agreement) between the Developer-Plaintiff and the Defendant the Purchaser individually. The Summons for Judgment is also taken out. Though served, the Defendant has not filed any reply to the Summons for Judgment.

2. The basic case of the Plaintiff/Builder/Promoter is revolving around the agreement. As alleged, the Defendant has purchased an industrial Gala in the Industrial Estate, constructed as Shiva Estate at village Bhandup, Lake Road, Bhandup (West), Taluka Kurla, District Mumbai. The Gala/Unit was intended to sale on ownership basis as contemplated under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (The MOFA Act).

3. The Plaintiff, who is a promoter within the meaning of Section 2(e) and as under obligation to execute an agreement for sale of Industrial Gala/Unit, as contemplated under Section 4 of the MOFA Act, has executed the duly stamped registered agreement. The relevant portion of Clause 12 of the agreement reads as follows:

"Until the society is formed and



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top