B.R.GAVAI
Seema Ajay Bhoosreddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Leave to amend prayer clause of Criminal Application No.621/2011. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.
3. By way of present revision application and criminal application, the applicants have approached this Court being aggrieved by the common order passed by learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Nasik dated 12th May 2011. Both applicants are accused in Sessions Case No. 46/2007. The applicant in Revision No.265/2011 is accused No.2 whereas applicant in Criminal Application No.621/2001 is accused No.1. They are facing trial for the offence punishable under section 306 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.). The applicants had filed application for discharge before the Sessions Judge. However, the learned Sessions Judge vide order dated 12th May 2011 has rejected the said application.
4. The applicantDr. Mrs.Seema Ajay Bhoosreddy is working as Professor in MGV Dental College and Hospital, Nashik. She is teaching the subject of oral surgery. The other applicantDr. Nitin Hemchandra Dani is a Professor and Head of Department of Peridontology in the same Dental College. The decease
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.