SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 1389

D.K.DESHMUKH, ANOOP V.MOHTA
Bhalchandra Datey – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.K.DESHMUKH, J.:

1. This petition has been filed basically challenging the Notification dated 4-11-1993 issued by the Government under Chapter VIII-A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act.

2. The relevant facts are, the subject matter of this petition is a property bearing Plot No. 167/B Dadar-Matunga Estate with a building standing thereon. Petitioners Nos. 1 & 2 are the owners of the property. Petitioners Nos.3 to 10 are the tenants occupying the building which is standing on the land. The Petitioner No.11 is the Builder with whom the owners/Petitioners Nos. 1 & 2 have entered into an agreement for development of the property. Respondents Nos.1 to 5 are the authorities of the State Government. Respondents Nos. 6 & 7 are also the tenants occupying the building on the aforesaid plot. Mr.Jahagirdar, the learned Sr.Counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that the Petitioner No.5 has recently expired leaving behind two legal representatives namely Ms.Pratima Lele and Mrs.Nilima Gokhale. He further states that the Petitioners Nos.1, 2 & 11 will abide by the agreement between the original Petitioner No.5 on one hand and the Petitioners Nos. 1,2 and 11 on the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top