SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 723

R.M.SAVANT
Chief Officer – Appellant
Versus
Pratibha Pradip Gaikwad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:D.M. Kale, Advocate.
For the Respondent:D.C.R. Mishra, Advocate.

Judgment :

Rule, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith and heard.

2) This petition takes exception to the order dated 22/3/2011 passed by the learned Member of the Industrial Court, Yavatmal whereby the revision application filed by the respondent herein came to be allowed and the respondent was directed to be reinstated till the decision in the Complaint (ULP) filed by her.

3) The respondent herein is the wife of one Pradip Sadashiv Gaikwad, who was initially appointed in the Construction Department of the Municipal Council on the post of Coolie and lastly working in the Health Department of the Municipal Council. The husband of the respondent died on 20/7/2005 while so working. As per recommendations of the Committee, known as Lad Committee, the respondent herein was appointed on the post which fell vacant on the death of her husband. The respondent accordingly joined in the post of Sweeper/Coolie in the Health Department of the Municipal Council on 4/11/2009. Thereafter on 19/12/2009, the service of the respondent came to be terminated on the ground that the respondent was not entitled to such appointment as per the recommendations of






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top