SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 677

R.K.DESHPANDE
Vilaschand s/o Deochand Khedikar (Jain) – Appellant
Versus
Bhimchand s/o Pannasao Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: U.K. Bisen, Counsel.
For the Respondent: P.P. Kotwal, Counsel.

Judgment :-

P.C.

The Learned Second Additional Judge, Small Causes Court, Nagpur, by its judgment and order dated 9.3.2007, has decreed the Regular Civil Suit No.404 of 2002. The petitioner/defendant, who is the tenant has been directed to deliver the vacant and peaceful possession of the suit premises to the respondent/plaintiff and enquiry into the future profits has also been directed to be made. The decree for eviction has been passed on the ground of arrears of rent and bonafide need. Regular Civil Appeal No.229 of 2007 filed by the petitioner challenging the decree passed by the Small Causes Court has been dismissed by the judgment and order dated 5.2.2010, by the Appellate Court.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has raised three points (1) the landlord has given an admission that there are other properties owned by him and the said properties have not been disclosed, (2) the burden to establish the bonafide requirement is upon the landlord, however the Trial Court has shifted the said burden upon petitioner and (3) no case has been made out for grant of decree for eviction and possession either on the ground of bonafide requirement or on the ground of arrears of re







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top