A.B. Chaudhari, J.

1. Heard. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Both these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

FACTS :

2. In Writ petition No.1916/2010 the petitioner claims to be a trustee of respondent no.4 education society while in Writ Petition No.1261/2010 the employees of the school run by respondent no.4 education society have a grievance in the matter of transfer of management of the school to respondent no.5 society by the respondent no.4 society.

SUBMISSIONS :

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in both writ petitions made the following submissions :-

(a) In Writ Petition No.1916/2010 Nitin Raghobaji Raut is a trustee of the respondent no.4 Matoshri Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha and the dispute amongst the trustees are pending before the Joint Charity Commissioner in the form of Application No.20/2009. Being a trustee, he obtained an order from the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur on 15th October 2009 below Exh.4 in Application No.20/2009 under section 47 of the Bombay Public Trust Act by which ad-interim stay was granted by the said authority staying the process of tran