ROSHAN DALVI
Sanchita Amitabh Dasgupta – Appellant
Versus
Amitabh Prashant Dasgupta – Respondent
1. Rule. Made returnable forthwith.
2. The Petitioner wife has challenged the order of the learned Family Court No.1 Pune vacating an injunction granted to her against dispossession in the premises in which she lived as a licensee. The Petitioner and the Respondent No.1 married on 21st April 2003. The Petitioner wife moved from Lucknow to Pune after her marriage. The husband and the wife resided in a flat owned by and belonging to the mother-in-law of the wife, the mother of the husband as licensee. A license agreement was executed by them as co-licensees under which they were required to pay Rs.5000/-per month to the licensor. The mother-in-law issued a notice for termination of license. The wife filed a petition for divorce and obtained an injunction protecting her possession. Thereafter the mother-in-law got herself on record of the Petition as a necessary party in view of the fact that her premises was taken to be shared residence of the parties in respect of which the wife obtained an order of injunction. Though the order of injunction was granted essentially against the husband, it impliedly included his mother as his relatives, attorneys and friends through him wer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.