D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANOOP V.MOHTA
Board of Control – Appellant
Versus
KPH Dream – Respondent
Oral Judgment: (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
1. This Appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge of this Court by which a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was allowed. By the order of the learned Single Judge the Appellant, the Board of Control for Cricket in India, has been injuncted from acting on the basis of a termination of 10 October 2010 of a franchise agreement entered into between the parties on 10 April 2008. The order of the Learned Single Judge is subject to several conditions including amongst them (i) That the Respondent shall furnish an unconditional bank guarantee of a nationalized bank to secure the payment of players ’ dues initially in the sum of US $18 million; (ii) The furnishing of an unconditional guarantee of a nationalized bank in the amount of US $3.5 million; (iii) The filing of unconditional personal undertakings guaranteeing the due payment of any amount as may be found on adjudication by any court or tribunal, in the event that the termination is upheld; (iv) A restraint on the disposal of shares of certain companies. In order to appreciate the challenge to the order of the learned Single Judge a re
Life Insurance Corporation of India v Escorts Ltd. (AIR 1986 SC 1370)
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Sriman Narayan (2002) 5 SCC 760
Dorab Cawasji Warden v Coomi Sorab Warden (1990) 2 SCC 117
Lachoo Mal v Radhye Shyam (AIR 1971 SC 2213)
Board of Control for Cricket in India v Netaji Cricket Club (2005) 4 SCC 741
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.