SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 542

R.Y.GANOO
Sou. Shantibai w/o Vithal Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
Vitthal Ramchandra Jadhav – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:R.R. Salvi i/b Smt. Suvarna B. Telgote, Advocates.
For the Respondent: None.

Judgment :

1. This Petition was admitted on 16th July, 2010. The Roznama shows that the respondent was present on 5th April, 2011. The matter was adjourned to 27th April, 2011 so that the respondent could remain present. On 27th April, 2011, respondent appeared, his advocate was absent. Out of indulgence, time was given to the respondent to arrange for his advocate or appear in person and the petition was adjourned to 4th May, 2011. On 4th May, 2011 when the petition was taken up for final hearing, respondent was found to be absent though called out on two occasions. Thereafter, I have heard learned Counsel Mr. Salvi on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was adjourned to today to give last chance to the respondent to remain present. Today also the respondent has remained absent. I take it that the respondent is not interested in opposing this petition. It is in these circumstances, by this order the petition is being disposed of.

2. The petitioner herein filed Hindu Marriage Petition No.131 of 2000 in the Court of learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara for divorce. The said petition was decided and by judgment and decree dated 20th September, 2004 the learned Joint














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top