A.M.KHANWILKAR, R.Y.GANOO
Shehnaz Arvind Mudbhatkal Adult – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Ramkrishna Mudbhatkal Adult – Respondent
R.Y. Ganoo, J.
1. Being aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 30th September, 2005 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Mumbai, in M.J.Petition No.A1945 of 1992 the appellant Smt. Shehnaz A. Mudbhatkal original Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as said wife) has filed this appeal against Respondent Dr. Arvind Mudbhatkal original Respondent (hereinafter referred to as said husband).
2. The wife filed the aforesaid petition No. A1945 of 1992 in the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai on or about 5th December, 1992 to seek following reliefs.
(a) That the marriage between the wife and the husband be dissolved by decree of divorce under Section 13(i) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 (For short HMA).
(b) The husband be directed to pay to wife a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month by way of permanent alimony and further Rs.5,000/- for one daughter Shahzia and Rs.5,000/for another daughter by name Sonia by way of permanent maintenance.
(c) Custody of the daughters Shahzia and Sonia be given to the wife
(d) for an order of injunction restraining the respondent husband from entering into the matrimonial home, altogether or coming in near by area, i.e. Flat No.A/702, Mil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.