SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 437

M.N.GILANI
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Bimala – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:N.P. Lambat, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1 to R5, Mrs. M.H. Pathade, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. The appellant / General Manager, Central Railways, filed this appeal under section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (in short the Act, 1987) questioning the award dated 17.11.2009 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur bench, Nagpur whereby the appellant was directed to pay compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- in equal share to the respondents nos. 1 to 5 (original applicants nos. 1 to 5).

2. Facts are thus: On 29.3.2004 while travelling by train no.2151 Pune-Howrah Express, Pintho Tudu met with an accident by falling from the running train. The dead body was seen in between Parsodi – Nagpur Railway Line in Jamtha Shivar near Pole No.821/28. It was alleged that he was holding valid ticket. The applicant no.1 widow and applicant nos.2 to 5 – children, filed the claim petition for award of compensation of Rs.4,00,000/-.

3. The appellant resisted the petition. It is disputed that the death of Pintho Tudu was on account of untoward incident. It was further alleged that the deceased was not holding a valid ticket and therefore, not entitled to any amount of compensation.

4. The learned Tribunal framed as many as five issues for its determination. On behalf of
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top