ANOOP V.MOHTA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Quick Communication Systems Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
The petitioner (The Chief Project Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai through the Union of India), has challenged Award dated 26.12.2008 passed by the learned Arbitrate Tribunal, by filing the present petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the Arbitration Act).
2. The summary of Award is as under:
“CLAIMANT'S CLAIMS:
Claims as per Claims as Amount
Claim No. Brief Description Terms of Modified vide CD Awarded
Reference III
1 Work done not paid 10,16,800/- 10,16,800/- 9,40,580/-
2 Payment of 6th Bill 6,61,180/- 6,61,180/- 5,75,431/-
3 Refund of Security 10,88,100/- 10,88,100/- 10,88,100/-
Deposit
4 Loss of profit 18,43,285/- 18,43,285/- 2,00,000/-
5 Loss of Advance 38,60,700/- 38,30,172/- 1,00,000/-
6 Loss due to 4,50,000/- 4,50,000/- 75,000/-
Infrastructure
7 Under utilization of 51,35,775/- 42,11,397/- Nil
labour
8 Under utilization of 25,67,888/- 21,30,480/- 50,000/-
overheads
9 Loss of business 25,67,888/- Withdrawn Nil
opportunities
10 Interest 24%P.A. 24%P.A Nil
11 Cost of Litigation 5,00,000/- 5,00,000/- Nil
TOTAL 2,74,50,374 30,29,111
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.