M.L.TAHALIYANI, P.V.HARDAS
Laxman Bapurao Ghaiwane – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
(M.L. Tahaliyani, J.)
1. Appellant feels aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-2, Wardha in Sessions Trial No.164 of 2006. The appellant has been convicted by the learned trial Court for the offences punishable under Sections 147 and 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code. He has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs.five hundred, in default to suffer imprisonment for fifteen days for the former offence and imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.one thousand and five hundred, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month for the later offence.
2. The appellant was original accused No.1 in the said sessions trial. He was tried along with accused Nos.2 to 7. The other accused have been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. However, they have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code and 323 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. The other accused have not filed any appeal against their conviction for the said two offences.
3. The appellant and other acc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.