Ranjit More, J.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. Since the question involved in these appeals is short, the respective counsel agree for disposal of these appeals finally at the admission stage. The parties to the above appeals are one and the same and the issue involved is also common, therefore, both the above appeals are being disposed by this common order.

2. The above appeals take exception to the orders passed by the learned Single Judge on 17th January, 2012 and 15th November, 2011, respectively in the above notice of motion in Suit (Lodging) No. 3026 of 2011. The brief facts giving rise to the above appeals are as follows:-

The appellant in both the appeals is the original plaintiff and respondents are the original defendants. (For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to by their original nomenclature as mentioned in the plaint.) The plaintiff and defendant No.1 are both engaged in manufacture of fire systems. The plaintiff and defendant No.1 both held patents in respect of the system and/or features thereof. Defendant No.1 was granted a patent in respect of fire systems under the Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to