1.heard shri g. Usgaonkar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and shri s. Mahambrey, learned additional government advocate appearing for the respondent.

2. rule. Heard forthwith by consent of learned counsel.

3. Shri s. Mahambrey, learned additional government advocate waives service on behalf of respondent.

4. The above petition challenges the order dated 21/10/2011 passed by the learned district judge, north goa, panaji, in land acquisition case no. 42/2009 whereby the application filed by the petitioners to produce documents namely the settlement report received by the petitioners under right to information act, a letter from the bank and an extract of notification of the government of india under section 48 of income tax act, came to be rejected.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has assailed the impugned order and pointed out the said documents are very much relevant for the purpose of deciding the matter in controversy as according to him the said documents support the claim of the petitioners for enhancement of compensation. The learned counsel further pointed out that during the course of the evidence of aw1 both the said documents were ma