SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 839

P.B.MAJMUDAR, ANOOP V.MOHTA
Regi Suresh Nair – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Putharakkal Nair – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:A.S. Khandeparkar i/by Shilpa Joshi, Advocates.
For the Respondent:H.K. Menghani, Advocate.

Judgment :

P.B. Majmudar, J.

Rule. By consent the Application is taken up for hearing today.

2. This is an Application filed by the Appellant/wife for condoning the delay of about 5 years, 144 days in filing the Appeal which is against the decree of divorce granted by the trial Court. The Respondent herein has filed a marriage Petition being Petition No.A1406 of 2005 for dissolving the marriage on the ground of cruelty & alternatively on the ground of judicial separation. The Family Court by its order dated 11 July 2006 passed an exparte decree by dissolving the marriage on the ground that though served the original Respondent/wife has not appeared in the proceedings. The trial Court accordingly allowed the application of the original Respondent/husband on 11 July 2006. It is the aforesaid order which is challenged in this Appeal. Since there is an inordinate delay for more than 5 years, this Civil Application is filed for condonation of delay.

3. Mr. Khandeparkar, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant/wife vehemently argued that this is a case in which the Respondent/husband surreptitiously and by committing fraud proceeded with the Family Court application against the wi

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top