SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Bom) 929

SHRIHARI P.DAVARE
Nandkumar Rajkumar Harane – Appellant
Versus
Vishwas Vilasrao Kshirsagar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
S.P.Katneshwarkar, B.V.Thombre, D.R.Korde

JUDGMENT

(1) Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

(2) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for parties, taken up for final hearing. By the present petition filed by the petitioner (original accused) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has prayed that the impugned order dated 7-1-2011, in Criminal Revision No. 114 of 2010, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, confirming the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 5th Court, Latur, below Exhibit 48 in S.T.C.C. No. 1734/ 2009, dated 11-6-2010, be quashed and set aside, and the application filed by the petitioner herein, below Exhibit 48, be allowed.

(3) Parties hereinafter are referred to as per their original status i.e. accused and complainant.

(4) The petitioner herein is the original accused and the respondent no. 1 herein is the original complainant who filed complaint against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, bearing S.T.C.C. No. 1734/2009, which is pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), 3rd Court, Latur. ft is alleged in the said complaint, that the complainant and accused are frien



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top