SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 134

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
B. N. DESHMUKH, A. A. HALBE, JJ.
BALASAHEB
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Crl. A. No. 141 of 1992,
Decided On : 18 -3 -1994 and 21 -3 -1994

The central legal point established in the judgment is the determination of consent and age in relation to the offences of kidnapping and rape.

Headnote:

CONSENT - Criminal Law - Ss. 363, 366-A, 376, 506, I.P.C. - The court discussed the provisions of Penal Code, more particularly Secs. 363, 366-A, and the age of the victim in relation to consent. The court considered the evidence of ossification test and the conduct of the victim to determine consent and age, ultimately leading to the acquittal of the accused.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant-accused appealed against the judgment of conviction for offences under Ss. 363, 366-A, 376, and 506, I.P.C. The case involved allegations of kidnapping and rape of the victim, Nanda, by the appellant-accused.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was consent on the part of the victim, Nanda, and that she could be 16 years or more, leading to the acquittal of the accused of all charges.

Issues: The key issues included determining the consent of the victim and establishing her age in relation to the offences of kidnapping and rape.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the evidence of ossification test and the conduct of the victim to determine consent and age, ultimately leading to the acquittal of the accused.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was acquitted of all the charges levelled against him.

JUDGEMENT

1. Being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction for offences under Ss. 363, 366-A, 376 and 506, I.P.C. and sentence of R.I. for three years and fine of Rs. 1000/- under first count; R.I. for five years and fine of Rs. 1500/- under second count R. I. for six years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- under the third count and R. I. for one year and fine of Rs. 500/- under the fourth count, recorded by the 4th Addl. Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No. 178 of 1991, the appellant-accused has preferred this appeal inter alia contending that the entire evidence led on behalf of prosecution clearly establishes the consent on the part of the victim Nanda d/o Mohan Darade and that the medical evidence is also to the effect that her age is 16 years or more and in that light of the matter, the learned Trial Judge felled in serious error in recording the contrary conclusion and convicting the appellant-accused for the offences indicated above and that the same should be rectified by allowing this appeal and acquitting the accused of all the charges alleged to have been established against him.

2. The learned advocate for the appellant has taken us through both oral and documentary evidence and has tried to suggest that the entire conduct of the victim Nanda is a conduct of consent and not of compulsion, force or seduction. Regarding the age, he has contended that the medical evidence comprising of ossification test shows that the age of Nanda might be between 14 and 16 years. He has drawn our attention to the observations in Modi's Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology, 21st Edition, page 40 wherein according to him, the margin of error might be + three years. If that be so, the age could be even 17 years and in view of this, the appellant-accused deserves to be acquitted. 3. The learned A.P.P., on the other hand, has drawn our attention to various provisions of Penal Code, more particularly Secs. 363, 366-A, wherein according to him, the age of the minority is 18 years, she being the female. He has, therefore, urged that when the appellant comes forthwith the specific defence that Nanda accompanied him and had sexual intercourse with the appellant, that is not tenable defence that Nanda accompanied him and had sexual intercourse with the appellant, that is not tenable defence and the conviction recorded by the learned Trial Judge should be maintained and should not be tinkered with.

4. In order to appreciate these rival arguments, salient facts canvassed on behalf of the prosecution shall have to be recorded. Complainant Nanda is the sister of Manda, who in turn is the wife of the appellant. The appellant hails from Rahuri whereas Nanda hails from village Pratappur, Taluka Sangamner, District - Ahmednagar. In the year 1991, Nanda was studying in 6th standard vernacular in the school at Ashwi, situated at a distance of about 3 to 4 kms. from Pratappur. She was attending the school by going from Pratappur to Ashwi. According to the prosecution, on 4th March 1991 the accused and his wife Manda visited the above village of Mohan - the father of Manda. It was night time at about 11 p.m. On this visit, Nanda served tea to the appellant, obviously being the brother-in-law of Nanda.

5. The further story of prosecution is that on 5th March 1991 at about 10 a.m., Nanda went to her school at Ashwi. At about 5 p.m. she was returning along with her friend Sitabai Rambhau Andhale along Matangwada Road. At that stage, the appellant accused appeared on a Spark moped. He asked complainant Nanda to accompany him on moped saying that his wife Nanda wanted to go to Rahuri early and the appellant was to accompany her. Nanda was made to sit on moped and in the first instance, the appellant took the victim Nanda towards village Pratappur. He turned towards other side saying that he wanted to have petrol for the moped at Loni. The same was not available at Loni and, therefore, both the appellant and victim proceeded on moped to the petrol pump at Rahuri Su

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top