M.L.TAHALIYANI
Chandrabhan S/o. Shyamrao Kale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Heard Mr. Karan Singh Gour, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms.Sangeeta Jachak, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for non-applicant/ State.
2. ADMIT.
3. Heard finally by consent.
4. The applicant is facing trial for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal code for allegedly setting his wife on fire. The trial is about to conclude as the same is now fixed for final arguments. At this stage, the applicant had moved the learned trial Court for production of entire medical record of the deceased when she was admitted at Mayo Hospital (Indira Gandhi Medical College), Nagpur as indoor patient. The applicant had also prayed for production of station diary entry in which the intimation given by D.W. No.1 to the Police Station was recorded. The applications Exhs. 78 and 80 have been rejected by the trial Court.
5. It is submitted by Ms. Jachak that it is too late for the applicant to move the trial Court for production of the documents. Ms. Jachak strongly opposed the prayer on the ground that the applicant was given sufficient opportunity at the time of recording of his statement under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The applicant had a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.