P.B.MAJMUDAR, R.D.DHANUKA
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai – Respondent
(R.D. DHANUKA. J.)
Rule. Respondents waive service. Heard finally by consent of parties.
2. This proceedings are under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Petitioners for a writ of certiorari for quashing and setting aside the approval and permission granted by some of the authorities who are Respondents in the present proceedings and for writ of mandamus directing the Respondent Nos. 1 to 19 to withdraw and set aside the approval and permission granted for development project of residential and commercial complex on the land bearing CTS NO. 381, 381/1 to 22 Village Anik, Tal. Chembur, MSD, Mumbai and for injunction from granting any further approval or permissions or renew the approval already granted to Respondent No.20 or any other person for or in connection with the development of the said land. (Hereinafter referred to as ‘Oswal land’). The Petitioners have also prayed for declaration and for striking down D.C. Regulation 57(4) (c) and D.C. Regulation 29(5) as also the Table 10 C (5) as being ultra vires, unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious.
3. The Petitioners have also prayed for a writ of prohibition against Respondent Nos. 1 to 19 prohibitin
Rameshwar Prasad & ors. v Union of India (2006) 2 SCC 1
T.Vijayalakshmi & ors. v Town Planning Member & anr. (2006) 8 SCC 502
F.B. Taraporwala & ors. v Bayer India Ltd. & ors. (1996) 6 SCC 58
M.C. Mehta & anr. v Union of India & ors. (AIR 1987 SC 965)
S.N. Rao & ors. V State of Maharashtra & ors. (AIR 1988 SC 712)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.