SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 742

A.P.BHANGALE
Kavita w/o. Bharatshing Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Bhujangrao s/o. D. Padole – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:P.S. Sahare, Advocate.
For the Respondent:A.B. Mirza, Advocate.

Judgment

The appeal questions validity and legality of the Judgment and order of acquittal recorded by learned 24th Judicial Magistrate, First Class and Special Judge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, at Nagpur.

2. The facts, briefly stated, are thus:-

The complainant stated that the accused is a close friend of her husband and since a long period, had requested for loan for his business in the sum of Rs. Two lacs, which was paid in cash on 15/01/2005. Loan Agreement was executed on a stamp paper in the denomination of Rs.100/-in presence of two witnesses. The accused had promised to repay the amount as early as possible. The accused had, in order to discharge his liability in part and as an installment, had issued a Cheque of Rs.10,000/-bearing No.594169, dated 02/12/2008 drawn upon the UCO Bank, Mount Road extension, Nagpur for encashment. The said Cheque was presented for encashment to the Union Bank of India, Katol Road, Nagpur. It was returned dishonored with remarks "insufficient Funds" and with an intimation memo, dated 20/05/2009. Demand notice was issued on 17/06/2009 by Registered Post A/D., which was received by the accused on 23/06/2009, but the accuse











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top