SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 49

R.C.CHAVAN
Satish Ramashankar Dube – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants:Rahul Kate, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mrs. M.R. Tidke, APP.

Judgment

Leave to replace page Nos 17 and 18.

2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by two persons against whom, offence under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code has been registered, after the investigation under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, was ordered by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vasai, upon a complaint by the first informant. The applicant No.1 himself had also filed report against the first informant whereupon an offence was registered on 28th June, 2011, itself. The injury certificate of victim Ramchandra on whose private complaint offence is registered shows that he had informed the Doctor a history of assault by three persons around 2.10 p.m. by plastic chair. The injuries observed are blunt trauma with tenderness over right cheek and tenderness to the lower jaw with three teeth loosened. This was in the context of the fact that the first informant's Manager has entered into some sort of agreement with applicant No.1 which soured up. Considering the nature of allegations made, the applicants' being in custody for the purpose of investigation is not at all necessary though the learned APP has very strong objection. In view of th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top