SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 159

In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
M.N. GILANI
Kisan & Others
Versus
State of Maharashtra
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 245 of 1998
Decided on: 23-01-2012

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:P.V. Navlani, h/f Anand Parchure, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mrs. Rashi Deshpande, A.P.P.

Headnote:[Indian] Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 307, 326 and 34 - Conviction for attempt to murder.

       Where accused assaulted injured persons with dangerous weapons but any of injuries not requiring victim to be an indoor patient therefore ingredients of Section 307, IPC not established, however conviction under Section 326, IPC liable to be sustained.

       [Indian] Penal Code, 1860 - Section 326/34 - Evidence Act, Section 3 - Conviction under Section 326/34, IPC.

       Since conduct of complainants of promptly lodging FIR naming all accused, explaining manner of assault and also disclosing about weapons, making prosecution case trustworthy hence conviction of accused persons warrants no interference.

       [Indian] Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 341 and 34 - Conviction for offence of wrongful restraint.

       Where accused opened assault upon injured persons when they reached at a particular place therefore accused not caused any wrongful restraint and thus conviction therefore, set aside.

       Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 307, 323, 326, 337, 341 and 34 - Conviction and sentence for attempt to murder. Where role of each of appellants-accused clearly spelt out and testimonies of PWs was corroborated by medical evidence but intention of appellants to commit murder was not proved by prosecution therefore conviction and sentence of appellants under Sections 337, 341 and 307, IPC cannot be sustained however appellants liable to be convicted and sentenced under Section 326, IPC.

Judgment

1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 20.07.1998 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon in Sessions Case No. 31/1993 whereby the accused nos. 1 to 4; (appellant nos. 1 to 4 herein) were convicted and sentenced as under:

(a) For the offence punishable under section 341 read with section 34 of the I.P.C. each was sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for fifteen days and to pay a fine of Rs.200/-each, in default to suffer R.I. for seven days;

(b) For the offence punishable under section 323 r/w 34 of the I.P.C. each was sentenced to suffer R.I. for three months and to pay a fine of Rs.200/-each, in default to suffer further R.I. for fifteen days;

(c) For the offence punishable under section 324 r/w 34 of the I.P.C. each was sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-each in default to suffer R.I. for three months;

(d) For the offence punishable under section 337 r/w 34 of the I.P.C. each was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/-each, in default to suffer S.I. for seven days.

(e) For the offence punishable under section 307 r/w 34 of the I.P.C. each was sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-each in default to suffer R.I. for six months;

The learned Sessions Judge further directed that out of the fine amount realized, Rs.3000/-be paid to the injured-Rambhau Sitaram Dhule as compensation. All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The facts of the case are thus:

One Sitaram Dhule and Sakharam Hage are residents of village Sungaon, Tq. Jalgaon Jamod, Dist. Buldhana. Their agricultural lands are adjacent to each other. Two months prior to the incident, there was dispute between Sitaram and Sakharam. The dispute was on the issue of boundary between their fields. On 06.01.1993 at about 5.30 p.m., Tulsabaicomplainant, her father-Sitaram and brother-Rambhau were carrying bullock-cart loaded with fodder to their house. When the bullock-cart reached near nullah, the accused persons, Kisan (A1), Shalikram (A2), Ramesh (A3) and Ananta (A4), appeared there and started pelting stones at Tulsabai-complainant, Sitaram and Rambhau. They restrained the bullock-cart to pass ahead. Rambhau was hurt by stone and fell down from the bullock-cart. At that time, Kisan (A1) dealt blow of an axe on the head of Rambhau. Shalikram (A2) dealt blow of sickle on the person of Rambhau as well as Sitaram. Ananta (A4) caused injuries by a goad-stick (a bamboo stick fixed with pointed nail to irritate bullocks to move or to run fast and also called as Purani). Tulsabai had sustained injury because of stones pelted at her by Shalikram (A2). Ananta (A4) also caused injuries by purani. Ramesh (A3) gave blow of sickle on the person of Rambhau and Sitaram. On basis of first information report lodged by Tulsabai, offence came to be registered.

3. Injured namely Tulsabai, Sitaram and Rambhau were sent for medical examination. After registering offence, Police visited the spot and drew spot panchanama on 07.01.1993. Samples of blood stained earth lying on the spot were collected. Stones which were pelted on the complainant and others were also seized. Statements of witnesses were recorded. Accused no.1 was arrested on 07.01.1993. On 07.01.1993, from his possession blood stained shirt was seized. Samples of blood of the accused persons were collected. Blood stained clothes, which were on the person of the injured were also seized. Kisan (A1) on 07.01.1993 made discovery statement, which resulted in recovery of axe stained with blood. On the same day, at the instance of Ramesh (A3), sickle stained with blood was seized. Shalikram (A2) made disclosure statement on 07.01.1993, which resulted in recovery of blood stained sickle. Ananta (A4) carried panchas and police to his house and produced a Purani. Muddemal articles were dispatched to Chemical Analyser and, thereafter, reports were received. On completion of investigation, charge-sheet was submitted. A
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top