SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 1720

High Court of Judicature at Bombay
D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & A.A. SAYED
Jeevanjyoti Krida and Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others
WRIT PETITION NO.949 OF 2012 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8386 OF 2011
Decided on: 11-09-2012

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Anil Anturkar with Mr. Sugandh B. Deshmukh, Advocates.
For the Respondent:R1 to R3, Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP, R4, Narendra V. Bandiwadekar, Advocates.

Headnote:Constitution of India - Article 226 - Transfer of recognition of Ashram School. Once an existing Ashram School was derecognized then there is no occasion to transfer erstwhile recognition to another Ashram School.

       The transfer of Ashram Schools involves two distinct concepts. The first concept involves a change in the location of the school where the Management does not undergo any change for that category, Where Government Resolution dated 1st August, 2007 specifies a distance of 10 kms. within which a change in location is permitted for exceptional reasons such as the prevailing situation in the area where the school is located or where adequate facilities are not available in the original location. The second concept is where the Management of an existing school is sought to be transferred and which may or may not involve a change in location.

       In the present case, the erstwhile primary Ashram School at Deegewadi in the district Solapur was derecognized and closed following the decision of the State Government taken on 18th October, 2010. By another Government Resolution dated 30th August, 2011 it allowed the application of the fourth respondent for the transfer of the said primary Ashram School to the district of Yavatmal. This is completely arbitrary.

       Evidently since a policy decision has been taken by the Government in 2006 not to allow new Ashram Schools, this was an attempt to get around that decision ostensibly by handing over the recognition of a derecognized school to another NGO. Once an existing Ashram School was derecognized, there would be no occasion to handover the recognition to another Ashram School. If as a result of the derecognizing of an Ashram School the Government is in a position to fund some other institution elsewhere in the State of Maharashtra, that is a completely separate and independent decision, in arriving at which a transparent decision making process must be followed. Recognition is not like a licence to enter on a business which can be transferred.

       Once recognition granted to a school is withdrawn, that original recognition ceases to exist in law and in fact there is no occasion then to ’transfer’ the erstwhile recognition to another institution.

Judgment

(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)

Rule, by consent made returnable forthwith. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents waive service on behalf of the respective Respondents. By consent, the Petitions are taken up for hearing and final disposal.

2. The Petitioner (in Writ Petition 949 of 2012) is registered under the provisions of the Bombay Public Trust Act 1950 and conducts a secondary school and a D.Ed. College, its activities being mainly confined to the district of Solapur. The Petitioner has challenged a Government Resolution dated 30 August 2011 by which the Social Justice Department of the State Government allowed the application of the Fourth Respondent for the transfer of a primary Ashram School from Deggewadi in the district of Solapur to the district of Yavatmal.

3. In 2003 the Petitioner had submitted a proposal to the Special District Welfare Officer, Solapur for opening a new primary Ashram School in the taluka of Akkalkot of the district of Solapur. No decision was communicated on that application. A trust by the name of Shri Swami Samarth Shikshan Sanstha, Akkalkot was conducting a primary Ashram School at Deggewadi. The Ashram School was closed on 18 October 2010 by the orders of the State Government on the ground that the school suffered from several deficiencies. Initially, in 2003 the State Government had issued an advertisement calling for applications from managements for conducting primary Ashram Schools in the State and it was in response to that advertisement that the Petitioner had applied in 2003. On 31 May 2006 the State Government took a policy decision to reject all applications received in pursuance of the advertisement issued in 2003 and a decision was taken not to grant new permissions for setting up primary Ashram Schools in the State of Maharashtra. The policy of the State Government has been to provide educational facilities through Ashram Schools for the upliftment of the educational, social and economic status of students belonging to Vimukta Jatis and Nomadic Tribes. There are approximately 973 aided Ashram Schools in the State of Maharashtra which are run by NGOs. The buildings in which the residential aided Ashram Schools are conducted are not owned by the State Government. In some cases the buildings are taken on a rental basis by the NGOs, while in other cases, they are owned by the NGO concerned. The State Government provides financial assistance for the payment of rent to those NGOs whose primary Ashram Schools are conducted in rented buildings and 75% of the rent is contributed by the government after certification by Public Works Department. Out of 973 Ashram Schools in the State, 97 are in the district of Solapur. Out of 97 Ashram Schools in the district of Solapur, 44 are primary schools imparting education from standards 1 to 7, 33 are high schools which provide for education from standards 8 to 10 while 20 are junior colleges to whom the 11th and 12th standards are attached.

4. As noted earlier, the erstwhile primary Ashram School at Deegewadi was derecognized and closed following the decision of the State Government taken on 18 October 2010. It is not in dispute before the Court that this decision was challenged by the management unsuccessfully. The policy of the State Government is that if an NGO is not conducting an Ashram School in accordance with the norms which are prescribed, an opportunity is granted to improve the working condition. If despite that an NGO fails to improve the management, the recognition is withdrawn. The management of the Ashram School is transferred to another eligible NGO which undertakes to run the school in accordance with the norms prescribed. The State Government provides several educational facilities through the Ashram Schools including accommodation, food, educational material, school uniforms and beddings.

5. In the present case, following the closure and derecognition of the school which was conducted by the erstwhile ma






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top