High Court of Judicature at Bombay
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
Mazda Construction Company & Others
Versus
Sultanabad Darshan CHS Ltd. & Others
Writ Petition No.3912 of 2012
Decided on : 31-08-2012
If areas in dispute, are styled as common amenities and claims are contested then that portion cannot be included in area forming part of deemed conveyance. - Competent authority ought to have seen agreement with members of respondent. It ought to have taken into account entitlement of parties in terms of that agreement. If that, agreement stipulates conveyance of right, title land interest of promoters in land and building, which was not crystallized therein, but clauses there of contemplates sub-division of plots and refers to layout which enables construction of building, then, that is stipulation which binds; both sides and which cannot therefore be overlooked in this case. Secondly if there was any doubt or dispute as to what forms subject-matter of deemed conveyance and which dispute is pending before Court, then all more further inquiry ought to have been made by competent authority before issuing certificate under Section 11. Competent authority cannot permit parties to claim something which is beyond their agreement with promoters or other relevant documents. If such is purpose sought to be achieved by insertion of Section 11, then instead of removing hardships of flat purchasers, amendments will give rise to further litigation and complications resulting therefrom. Therefore what should guide competent authority in each case is entitlement in terms of documents which are referred to in Sections 10, 11 and equally in preceding provisions including particulars and details of agreements with flat purchasers.
Word ’unilateral’ has some definite significance. Once unilateral deemed conveyance i s enforced by competent authority, then, all more when litigation is pending to which both are parties, areas styled as garden and open access should not have been included in order and certificate issued by competent authority. Their inclusion has thus vitiated order of competent authority. There is substance in contentions that competent authority over stepping its limits in this case.
Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction Sale Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 - Sections 5-A, 10 and 11 - Unilateral deemed conveyance.
Unilateral deemed conveyance, enables flat purchasers to acquire promoter’s right, title and interest in land and building. - Amendment in Section 5-A is to set up competent authority for purpose of exercising powers and performing duties under Sections 5, 10, 11. It is not possible to read Section 5-A in isolation but it should be seen in backdrop of what Legislature desired and intended to achieve. Legislature intended that such powers and duties which have to be performed under Sections 5, 10, 11 have not been performed and that causes inconvenience and hardship to flat purchasers. Since they are not organised into proper legal entity such as co-operative, housing society or company, title to property cannot be perfected. Situation arises where Society owns building consisting of flats and apartments but not property. Therefore building belongs to Society but land beneath it does not belong to it or is not owned by it. Such situation presents several obstacles, difficulties and hurdles in development of property, utilization and exploitation of its potential to fullest. In these circumstances and when advantage is taken of delay in execution of conveyance within prescribed time and delivering of documents, that it was intended to set up authority which would convey property by unilateral deemed conveyance. Such conveyance by itself is thus capable of being registered.
Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction Sale Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 - Sections 5-A, 10 and 11 - Word "deemed".
Word ’deemed’ used in statute, means, regard or consider in specified way. - When Legislature is mindful of fact that Unilateral Instrument is to be registered as deemed conveyance, then, all more there is no scope for apprehensions expressed. Word ’deemed’ must therefore be understood accordingly and should be construed by reading it with words preceding it.
Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction Sale Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 - Sections 5-A, 10 and 11 - Word "Unilateral".
Word ’unilateral’ used in statute, means one sided, performed by or affecting only one person, group or country. - Legislature has been careful to provide for appropriate inquiries and opportunities so that certificates should not be issued for asking and equally when Registration officer is approached with unilateral instrument of conveyance it would not be straightaway registered. In this regard word unilateral and its meaning in common parlance is extremely relevant. If it is understood, thus, then, parties like petitioners need not have any apprehension and particularly of loosing and surrendering or taking away their legal rights.
Key Points: - The judgment discusses the role and limits of the Competent Authority under MOFA Sections 5A, 10 and 11 in issuing a unilateral deemed conveyance (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) . - It emphasizes that the deemed conveyance should reflect the entitlement as per the registered agreements with flat purchasers and documents referenced in Sections 3, 4, and 11, not broader or disputed common areas (!) (!) . - It holds that inclusion of disputed or contested areas such as gardens and certain access roads, when entitlement is in dispute, can vitiate the certificate and overstep the Authority’s limits; the order should be restricted to the land and buildings with clear entitlement, pending final civil adjudication (!) (!) (!) . - The court partially allows the writ petition, restricting the certificate to the defined land (CTS 356/16) while noting possible use of a garden/road area subject to rights and final civil court orders, and preserving rights of parties (!) . - The judgment explains the meaning of key terms "unilateral" and "deemed" and their constitutional/legal context to prevent arbitrary action by authorities (!) (!) (!) . - It asserts that the Competent Authority must verify authenticity of documents and provide a reasonable opportunity to be heard before certifying a deemed conveyance (!) . - It clarifies that the promoter's obligation is to convey title in accordance with the agreement; the deemed conveyance powers fill gaps when promoters fail to act, but must align with the agreements and documents (!) (!) (!) (!) .
1 Heard.
2 Rule. The Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith.
3 By this Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are challenging the order dated 11.04.2012, copy of which is at Annexure-A to the Writ Petition, by which the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City-3 & Competent Authority under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management & Transfer) Act, 1963 (for short “MOFA”), on an application bearing No.55/2011 has directed as under:-
“In exercise of the powers conferred on me under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963, I, S.P.Ghorpade, District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City (3), Competent Authority under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963,
1. certify under section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963, that the Sultanabad Darshan Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., CTS No.356/16, Village : Oshiwara, Taluka : Andheri, Mumbai Suburban District, Jogeshwari (W), Mumbai 400102 are entitled and is a fit case to grant unilateral conveyance executed as deemed conveyance in their favour and to have it registered. Thus, it is entitled to have unilateral conveyance of land admeasuring 432.30 Square meters of land bearing CTS No.356/16 and proportionate area of gardening admeasuring 109.10 sq.mtrs. of subdivided plot bearing CTS No.356/13 and proportionate area of access road admeasuring 150 sq.mtrs. of 30 feet wide of subdivided plot bearing CTS 356/4 proposed road of a large piece of land admeasuring 14,682 sq.yrds. or 12,276 sq.mtrs. Village Oshiwara, Jogeshwari, Taluka Andheri, Mumbai Suburban District. The aggregate area to be conveyed to the applicant society is works out 691.40 sq.meters and the buildings constructed on the said land and is entitled to get the unilateral conveyance deed prepared and executed, as deemed conveyance and get it registered as provided under the Act.
2. I hereby authorize the applicant society to prepare a Conveyance Deed to be executed as unilateral conveyance as deemed conveyance of all the right, title and interest of the promoters Hassanali Raje Lalal, Shri Gulshan A Merchant, Kulsum A Raje and also M/s Mazda Construction Company through M/s Bhaktawar Construction Company Private Limited and the land owners Noshirwan Muluk Irani, Gulabai Muluk Irani, Kanubhai Ramanlal Shah, Shera Mokhan Irani and Sheela Ardhasar Irani and M/s Maredia Enterprises or their legal heirs, assignees, executors in respect of land admeasuring about 432.30 square meters bearing CTS No.356/16 at Oshiwara village, Andheri Taluka, Mumbai Suburban District, Jogeshwari (West), Mumbai 400102 and proportionate area of gardening admeasuring 109.10 sq.mtrs. of subdivided plot bearing CTS No.356/13 and proportionate area of access road admeasuring 150 sq.mtrs. of 30 feet wide of subdivided plot bearing CTS 356/4 proposed road of a large piece of land admeasuring 14,682 sq.yrds. or 12,276 sq.mtrs. village Oshiwara, Jogeshwari, Taluka Andheri, Mumbai Suburban District. The aggregate area to be conveyed to the applicant society is works out 691.40 sq. meters and the buildings constructed on the said plot of land in favour of it and also as provided under Section 11(5) of the Act, direct the sub registrar or the concerned appropriate Registration Officer appointed under the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908) to register this certificate issued by me along with the Instrument of conveyance executed by me as per the power conferred on me and to be submitted to the Sub-Registrar unilaterally by the applicant as I have been exempted under the Act to appear before the registration Authority and after complying with the provisions of the law
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.