SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1491

V.C.DAGA, J.P.DEVADHAR
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Appellant
Versus
NEELAM APPLIANCES. AND COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. A. Harpale - Applicants.
P. V. Surte - Respondents.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

V. C. DAGA, J. - These two references are forwarded by the Sales Tax Tribunal at the instance of the Revenue for opinion of this Court under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 ("the Act", for short). Since the issues in both these references are identical, both the references are heard and disposed of by a common judgment. For the sake of convenience we have taken the facts from the case of M/s. Neelam Appliances.

Statement of facts :

The respondent-Neelam Appliances is a manufacturer of stainless steel articles registered under the provisions of the Act. The respondent applied to the Commissioner of Sales Tax for determination of the correct rate of tax on the sale of stainless steel water filter, effected under their invoice No. 42/93-94 dated May 3, 1993.

It was the contention of the respondent before the Commissioner of Sales Tax as also before the Tribunal that the stainless steel water filter was stainless steel utensil, covered by Schedule entry C-II-46 covered by entry No. 145(1) of notification issued under the provisions of section 41 of the Act, thereby it attracts tax at 1 per cent.

The Commissioner of Sales Tax by order dated July 12, 1993









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top