SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Bom) 62

B.P.SARAF, D.K.TRIVEDI
TATA EXPORTS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. S. Gaitonde and K. B. Bhujle, for the applicant.
R. V. Desai, for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the Court was delivered by

DR. B. P. SARAF, J. - By this reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made at the instance of the assessee, the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal has referred the following question to this Court for opinion :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Assistant Commissioner had jurisdiction to take any action under section 57 of the Act and thereby levying penalty for the first time under section 36(2)(c) of the Act and consequently the Tribunal confirming orders of the lower authorities ?"

Obviously the above question is a pure question of law and the answer thereto would depend on a proper construction of section 57 and section 36(2) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 ("the Act").

2. The assessee, who is a dealer under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, was assessed by the Sales Tax Officer by his order of assessment dated June 30. 1975, under section 33(3) of the Act for the period April 1, 1972 to March 31, 1973. No appeal or revision was filed by the assessee against the above order of assessment.

3. After more than one and half years of the completion of the assessment, the Assistant






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top