SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Bom) 28

D.P.MADON, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
BATA INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. A. Dada with B. Damodar, for the applicants.
Miss Farida T. Sikandar, for the respondents.

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the Court was delivered by

MADON, C.J. - The applicants, Bata India Limited, are registered as dealers under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The applicants carry on business in footwear. At the relevant time, entry 24 in Schedule A to the said Act and entry 21 in Schedule C to the said Act dealt with footwear. Under entry 24 in Schedule A footwear made by hand without using power at any stage when sold at a price not exceeding Rs. 15 per pair was exempted from tax. As the footwear sold by the applicants was not made by hand without use of power, entry 24 had no application to the case of the applicants. Entry 21 in Schedule C at the relevant time provided as follows :

"Serial Description of goods Rate of Rate of No. sales tax. purchase tax. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21. Footwear - (a) other than that specified Five paise Five paise in entry 24 in Schedule A, in the rupee. in the rupee. when sold at a price not exceeding Rs. 15 per pair;

(b) other than that specified











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top