SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Bom) 72

D.P.MADON, M.H.KANIA
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Appellant
Versus
KOLHAPUR ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. S. Cooper with R. A. Dada, for the applicant.
B. C. Joshi, for the respondents.

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the Court was delivered by

KANIA, J. - This is a reference under section 34(3) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act"), made at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax.

The facts giving rise to this reference are as follows : In respect of the assessment period from 1st April, 1954, to 31st March, 1955, the assessees (respondents) claimed a set-off in respect of an amount of Rs. 2,761-4-9, which included, inter alia, an amount of Rs. 437-8-6, being the amount of general sales tax paid by the assessees on the purchase of certain electric meters, which were given by the assessees on rent to the consumers to whom the electricity produced by the assessees was supplied. It may be mentioned that the assessees were registered dealers under the said Act and were engaged in the generation and distribution of electricity. The claim of the assessees for set-off in respect of the said amount of Rs. 437-8-6 (hereinafter referred to as "the said amount") was disallowed by the sales tax authorities on the ground that such a set-off was not admissible under rule 11(2)(c) of the Bombay Sales Tax (Exemptions, Set-off and Compositio






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top