SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Bom) 74

S.T.DESAI, SHAH
R. B. N. S. BORAWAKE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BOMBAY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J. P. Pandit, for the assessee.
M. J. Mistree, for the State.

JUDGMENT

SHAH, J. - The assessee is carrying on agricultural operations on a very large scale. In his field he produces sugar-cane, ground-nut, til, cotton, kardi, onion, wheat, tobacco and fruits. He sells the produce at the two offices maintained by him one at Kopargaon and the other at Shrirampur in the district of Ahmednagar. As the sugar-cane cannot after cutting be kept without deterioration for a long time, he extracts juice and prepares gur out of it and sells it at his office. The question which arose before the Sales Tax Authorities was whether he is, in the circumstances, a dealer within the meaning of section 2(6) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953.

The expression "dealer", so far as it is material, is defined by section 2(6) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act as meaning any person who carries on business of selling goods in the State of Bombay whether for commission, remuneration or otherwise. That definition is followed by an explanation which is not material for the purpose of this case. There is an exception to the definition which provides that an agriculturist who sells exclusively agricultural produce grown on land cultivated by him personally shall not be deemed to be a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top