D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, A.A.SAYED
Suman N. Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Rule, by consent made returnable forthwith. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents waives service on behalf of the Respondents. By consent, both the Petitions are taken up for hearing and final disposal.
2. The Petitioner has sought to impugn in these proceedings under Article 226 the validity of (i) a notice to show cause dated 29 August 2005 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Drawback Department; (ii) an order dated 20 September 2007 of the Commissioner of Customs (Export Promotion); and (iii) a notice of demand dated 1 November 2011 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Special Recovery Cell. When the Petition came up for preliminary hearing on admission, an order was passed by this Court on 19 December 2011 recording the statement of the Petitioner that the challenge is being restricted only to the notice of demand dated 1 November 2011 (Exhibit C) and that the other reliefs in prayer (a) are not being pressed. The challenge before the Court is accordingly confined to the aforesaid limited extent.
3. A notice to show cause was issued on 29 August 2005 under Section 124 of the Customs Act 1962 to several entit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.