SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Bom) 74

U.V.BAKRE
Shirish Vasant Borkar – Appellant
Versus
Vijaykumar K. Pillienkar Fadke – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:M.S. Joshi, Advocate.
For the Respondents: None present.

Judgment :

By this appeal, the appellant, who is the complainant in Criminal Case No.643/NI/OA-II/2003/D, takes exception to the judgment and order of acquittal dated 9/10/2009 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Margao (J.M.F.C, for short), in the said case.

2. The complainant had filed the said case against the accused who is the respondent no.1 in this appeal, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (N.I. Act, for short). The case of the complainant is that:-

The complainant along with his wife executed an Agreement of Assignment with the accused on 29/1/2003 in respect of shop premises being shop no. S-5, situated on the ground floor of the building “Vishwanath Apartments”, at Borda, Margao-Goa. As per the said agreement, the complainant and his wife agreed to sell and/or assign all their rights in the said shop no. S-5 in favour of the accused for a total consideration of Rs. 4,00,000/-. The complainant was running a spare parts shop in that shop under the name and style “Laximi Auto Spares”. Towards the cost of the fixtures, furniture and goods lying in the said shop, the accused orally agreed to pay to the complainant a total sum of Rs.1,10,000/-
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top