A.M.KHANWILKAR, MRIDULA BHATKAR
Vidarbh Infotech Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Pune Municipal Corporation – Respondent
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, was filed on 18th February, 2011 praying for setting aside the decision of Respondent No. 1 holding Respondent No. 2 qualified for Tender No. 1 Recall 2010 and further, direct Respondent No. 1 to award that contract under Tender No. 1 Recall 2010 to the Petitioner and not to award the contract under the said tender to Respondent No. 2. However, as during the pendency of this Writ Petition, the work order was issued by Respondent No. 1, in favour of Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner has amended this Petition pursuant to liberty given by this Court in terms of order dated 31st March, 2011, and has additionally asked for setting aside the said work order dated 5th March, 2011 issued in favour of Respondent No. 2.
2) It is relevant to note that on 31st March, 2011, the Court, while granting leave to the Petitioner to amend the Petition, made it clear that any action taken from that date will be subject to the further orders that may be passed by this Court in this Petition.
3) As aforesaid, before this order came to be passed, the work order was issued to Respondent No. 2 on 5th March, 201
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.